![]() The tracker has a geofencing feature, although you will have to go to the settings and explore it before getting it. One problem the models seems to have is the difficulty you get when trying to connect your phone to the signal once the lost object gets out of range, and the alerts it gives do not help much either. The Bravo is however harder to spot when you use it in the dark, as it has a single LED light, compared to the Pixel that has a multitude of LED lights. It is small, and ranks among the smallest trackers on the market, yet giving better volume levels and range compared to the Trackr Pixel. While it does its best to perform its duties, it lacks the consistency you will find in the best models. This is mainly a lightweight and nicely designed key finder that you usually forget about once you slip it on your keychain, until you require its help. Inconsistency in performance (especially geofencing).The flashing LED light makes finding lost objects easier.However, changing the battery can prove a difficult process when you do it without any guidance, because of the slippery components. The battery is replaceable, which is a major plus because it allows you to use the device for many years without having to buy new trackers all the time. One thing that does stand out though, is the location history – in fact, the Trackr Pixel reveals the last several places the object was in, instead of just the current location. The tracker itself does not help much in terms of tracking your keys, but that might be due to the inconsistencies of Bluetooth rather than the tracker itself. However, it is rather empty on all the other relevant features, which is disappointing really – as it does not have anything that makes it stand out other than the tones. This is mainly a small tracker that has the benefit of being painless to set up, a major plus if you are looking for something simple to work with, even as a beginner. If you are in an area full of noise, you will want a key finder that is louder than the crowd to help you find your items. The Pixel has an advertised volume of 82dB, compared to the Bravo volume of 90dB. You should also note that the alert volume for the Pixel is quite weak. The Bravo however, uses geofencing (a combination of location services and Bluetooth) to locate lost items, although the consistency is an issue. Other Trackr Pixel users can help you locate your lost items, and their trackers send signals to Trackr to tell you where they have spotted the object. In the Trackr Pixel, which works like the Community Find feature on various key finders. The Trackr Pixel has the advantage of working well with Alexa Skrill, which has a painless process of setting up – simply open the mobile app and follow its prompts to add the tracker, then press the device’s button. When it comes to using third party apps with Bluetooth trackers, not everything can work with all the third party apps. Bravo – What are the differences? The Pixel working with Alexa Skill ![]() What are the differences between Trackr Pixeland Bravokey finders? How do they compare? Key finder ![]() It is very inconveniencing when you lose them, because replacing them is such a hassle, in addition to presenting a security risk.In this article, we look at two key finders that may seem similar on the surface, but inherently have their own distinguishing factors. If you are reading this article, then you might be wondering why technology has not improved the efficiency of looking for lost keys. While Bluetooth finders are not all that they are made out to be, some prove to be more useful than others. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |